The American Birthrate Is In A Hard Decline.
Why are they bringing in non-citizens to boost the declining replacement numbers?
There are multiple tiers to this highly nuanced issue.
When I began to research this topic, I soon found out that, this is honestly the most frightening rabbit hole that I have ever seen. In fact, the numbers of deaths that come from these factors easily rival any of the known wars, or any other historically significant loss of life event for that matter. More death can be tied to this, than WW2, and WW1 combined.
The starting point was hard to find, but once I did, my friggin mind was blown. They have made it nearly impossible to determine whether it is from causation, or correlation, with each of the many factors. Ironically enough though, we can see with each dip in the average number of replacement rates, it lines up with a new social “trend” in America. These trends at the time were all highly contested, and were considered too progressive and edgy. Some of you may think this sounds familiar, and is nearly identical to the nature of our modern decline in birth rates, it is. Some of the same key players, and organizations like Planned Parenthood, and factions within the US Government are still running the show. They can't take credit for all of it though, just a large portion.
The Beginning.
Planned Parenthood, and Margaret Sanger’s “womens freedom” movent were already running at full steam by the 1960’s. By then public talk of such things was becoming a bit less taboo, and more mainstream. Almost like it was commercially normalized, both in print and broadcast. . . . 🤔 Anyways, birthrates started to heavily decline in 1960, with the introduction of “Birth Control” to the US population. By 1965 at least 1 in 4 American women had taken some form of it. From all of the available metrics, between 1960, and 1975 the birthrates in America dropped to less than half of its prior peak in the mid to late 1950’s. It dropped from about 24 pregnancies per 1000 people in 1957, down to about 16 per 1000 in 1975.
You did read that correctly, the hard decline started in 1957, but birth control wasn't publicly available until 1960. What is not commonly known, is that Enovid, (progesterone) the original birth control pill, was actually first prescribed as a Hormonal Regulator for several years prior. They noticed that the women who took it daily, were also unable to bear children. They ran the numbers from the introduction of progesterone in the 1950’s and knew for certain immediately that it caused a massive decline in US births. Did they panic and say something like “gee willackers” that chemical is dangerous, look what it did to the reproduction rates. No, they didn't, what happened instead was a blanket FDA approval to market it to a much broader spectrum of the population. Rather than pulling it from the shelves, and finding ways to make it safer, they just mass marketed it instead. In other words, if the government found declining birthrates to be a problem, they would have stopped this long ago. They didn't.
Come to think of it, they have a tendency to skew numbers to make problems look less drastic than they actually are. Now with that issue in plain sight, we should look at a few more sets of data. Those metrics above are very nonspecific, it mentions (per 1000 people), but doesn't specify the age of them, or their sex. Perhaps there is a less drastic difference if we just look at a more specific age and sex bracket. Take a gander at the metrics for just women, and for the sake of accuracy we will look even more specifically at prime birthing aged women. According to science that is between 15 - 44 years old. As you can see below, it's actually far more drastic than the first graph was making out to be.
Thanks to “USAFacts.org” for this graph, it actually does show that the numbers can be heavily skewed by adding some irrelevant demographics to the pool. When you look at the bracket of society who would be most affected by the substances, it's clearly young ladies on up to middle aged women. Just for clarity, I added three different sources for the birthrate metrics below the article.
So the first drop was triggered by an up swinging trend in medications, both hormonal regulators, and birth control. This didn't end in the 1970’s though, it just kept going.
The Next Era.
You would think with the whole “free love” age of the mid to late 1960’s and early 1970’s, the birth rates would have increased not decreased. Somehow that's clearly not the case. This was still just the beginning of the big decline. This drop is one that has continued to fall right on into modern day. When I mentioned earlier in the article that this topic was a rabbit hole, I think that was a significant understatement.
The sheer amount of controversy, and dare I use the word conspiracy, behind the allegation of US Governments involvement in spreading, or at the very least supporting some of the following items we will cover. It sounds all dark and ominous now, and trust me it gets there, but there is also lot of nuance. In fact, it's so much nuance that it would be impossible to cover in a single article. That means we will cover the basics here, and leave a majority of the nuance in the links and sources. That way you can dig at it piece by piece later as you see fit. That being said, let's get back to the basics.
From the 1960’s into the 1970’s, and from then to the 1990’s, the United States saw an intense and rapid change in the drug culture. Natural drugs like Cannabis, Opium, and Mushrooms, were replaced with things like Acid, and LSD. Then it seems like almost overnight, that drug trend gave way, and was then replaced by Cocaine, and Quaaludes. Then those faded and we land in the 1990’s with the well known Crack cocaine, prescription Amphetamines, and prescription painkillers. To watch the evolution of drug trends unfold, and see how it impacted society, and thus the birth rates is fascinating. Especially when you consider that now, medical cannabis “The Devil's Lettuce” is available in over half of the Country.
Every claim that has been made about direct correlations between drugs, and the birth rates can be factored in, but only if you also take into account the Governments role in both making them illegal, and physically spreading them on the streets. You may be asking why, and that answer is simple, it’s because of where they spread them. California has historically been ground zero for most of these trends. If you look deeper into the data, you will see that almost all of these drugs have an uptick in California, then within a year the metrics climb all over America. A nearly identical uptick can be seen in the birth rates first in California. Right where the trends become normalized socially, before they made it into TV shows, Movies, and News, we can see huge swings.
Oh, by the way, if I forgot to mention it the Government uses Hollywood, and the Media to spread these ideas. What that does, is simply desensitize people to them slightly. Then, if they see these things happening in their cities, or neighborhoods, by then the normalization creates a reaction that is less drastic and by far less panicked. Look at the mostly peaceful tent societies that are popping up nearly everywhere across America. They are filled with fentanyl worshipping cults, who's members are clearly not out reproducing, and adding productive people to the ranks of future American tax payers.
Planned Parenthood
Let's be honest about a few things here, before someone begins saying they are the biggest, or even the only problem. If people were happy, and everyone was comfortable enough with their economic status to have children, they would be. There would be no public need for businesses like theirs, if people were not seeking these things out in huge numbers. The drug culture, or distrust in the government, maybe even personal monetary or larger economic reasons have largely influenced the public desire to have children. This is not an accident, nor is it planned parenthoods fault. They are simply a utility that wanted to offer a controversial service, and the Government needed them to succeed. The Guttmacher Institute, and a few other well known agencies also deserve a nod in the mention of planned parenthood. After all, Margaret Sanger could not have made it the “public option” if not for the huge amount of government funding.
Remember earlier when I said pay attention to where things get located, and what happens there. Well, the location of these planned parenthood centers is another perfect example of this. These things are largely located in less wealthy areas of the cities, and the urban areas outside of them. You almost never see one of these outside of a wealthy gated community, or in a suburban strip mall. Again, none of this is accidental, or happened by coincidence. The birth rates in these areas are being more heavily affected. If ever before there was a real valid argument for the existence of systemic racism, this would be it.
Sterilizing Adults For Decades, But Now It’s Done To Children Also.
Do I need to get into this one, or has everyone with a phone, TV, or computer seen enough of it already? That's what I thought. But, just for those out there who are still unaware, this next bit is for you. There is a vast number of people out there encouraging the use of puberty blockers, and hormone replacements on children. This removes all of their potential to decide later in life to have children, because it also permanently sterilizes them.
Who would support that ? Well…
Yes this is a real political issue, and no it has no basis in reality, science, or tangible facts. The current candidate for vice president is nick named Tampon Tim, because he is responsible for Tampon dispensers being put in the boys bathrooms and Minnesota schools.
Again, all of these things guarantee a lower future birth rate.
Less marriage
Birth Control
Drug Culture
Abortions
Sterilization (sex changes)
Thank you for reading.
Links and Sources :
Birth Rate Decline -
https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/usa/united-states/birth-rate#:~:text=The%20birth%20rate%20for%20U.S.,a%200.09%25%20increase%20from%202020.
https://usafacts.org/articles/how-have-us-fertility-and-birth-rates-changed-over-time/
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1037156/crude-birth-rate-us-1800-2020/
Government Says Just Import More People.
https://youtu.be/2Sg8CFVUa1o?si=y6YXQ4FXhwqkBB8U
Planned Parenthood, and Margaret Sanger.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood
https://womanisrational.uchicago.edu/2022/09/21/margaret-sanger-the-duality-of-a-ambitious-feminist-and-racist-eugenicist/
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/pill-eugenics-and-birth-control/
Planned Parenthood, and Eugenics.
https://archive.ph/20130414073645/http://www.biodemog.org/
https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/american-eugenics-society-1926-1972
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Frank_Guttmacher
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Frank_Guttmacher
The NEW Normal !
https://burgerstee.com/product/tampon-tim-tampax-box-tim-walz-meme-t-shirt/
The strength of your country and what it can produce is based on the number of children that are born.
The fact that our government has been in the business of destroying families and killing children since the 1950s should be an indicator that we are being betrayed by a death cult.
The big question is why would you want to destroy your own country by killing off its population? What possible gain could be had?
The way I see it is that if you don't have the numbers, you can't project power and you can't influence the rest of the world.
There was a time when we were seen as the "Shining city on the hill" and were an inspiration to the rest of the world that being free in both mind, body, and spirit was a good thing.
Now, our own children hate the country, our men no longer want to fight for it, and our women would rather become slaves of third world criminals than birth children for us.
Is this what we get for turning our back on the creator?
The fact that non-citizens are being brought in won't matter. In time, they'll become as we are, drugged out, brain dead, childless and weak.